Home / Guides / Wear and tear vs damage

Deposit Deductions

Wear and Tear vs Damage: What UK Landlords Can (and Can't) Charge For

The distinction that decides most deposit disputes — explained with real examples.

Almost every deposit dispute comes down to this one distinction. "Damage" is something a landlord can usually charge for. "Fair wear and tear" is something they can't. The trouble is that landlords often label ordinary wear as damage, hoping the tenant won't push back. Here's how the line is actually drawn in practice.

The basic definitions

Fair wear and tear is the gradual deterioration that happens simply from living somewhere and using it normally: carpet fibres flattening in high-traffic areas, paint dulling slightly, hinges loosening, mattress springs softening. It happens regardless of how careful the tenant is.

Damage is deterioration beyond that — a burn mark from a dropped iron, a large ink stain, a hole punched in a door, a broken window. It usually results from a specific event or from a level of neglect beyond ordinary use.

Three questions adjudicators actually ask

1. How long was the tenancy? A scuffed carpet after five years is expected. The same scuff after five months looks more like damage.
2. What was the condition at check-in? Without a signed inventory or photos from move-in day, a landlord has no baseline to compare against — which usually favours the tenant.
3. Was it a one-off event or gradual change? A single stain, tear, or breakage points to damage. A slow, even change across the whole item points to wear and tear.

The "betterment" principle

Even where something genuinely was damaged, a landlord can't use it as an excuse to get a brand-new replacement paid for by the tenant. If a five-year-old carpet with an expected life of around ten years is damaged, the fair deduction is roughly what that partly-used carpet was still worth — not the full price of a new one. This is often called the betterment principle: the landlord shouldn't end up better off than they were before the tenancy started.

Useful life, in practice

Deposit scheme adjudicators commonly work from rough depreciation guidance for typical items — figures such as a carpet lasting around ten years, or interior paintwork needing refreshing every three to five years regardless of tenants. These aren't fixed legal rules, but they're widely used as a reasonableness check, and they're worth quoting back to a landlord who's proposing to charge you for a full replacement.

Examples that usually count as wear and tear

• Faded curtains or carpet from sunlight exposure
• Small scuffs and marks on walls from normal furniture placement
• Loosened door handles or hinges after years of use
• Minor carpet flattening in walkways and under furniture

Examples that usually count as damage

• Cigarette burns or large stains on carpet or furniture
• Holes in doors or walls beyond small picture-hanging marks
• Broken fixtures, fittings, or appliances through misuse
• Significant mould caused by a failure to ventilate, as opposed to a building defect

Frequently asked questions

What counts as fair wear and tear?

Gradual deterioration from ordinary daily use — faded paint, worn carpet paths, loose hinges — rather than damage from a specific event.

Can a landlord charge full replacement cost for a worn carpet?

Generally no. The betterment principle means any charge should be depreciated for the item's age and remaining useful life.

Does the length of my tenancy affect what counts as wear and tear?

Yes — the longer the tenancy, the more wear is expected, and the more depreciated any fixtures and furnishings are assumed to be.